Theft
Theft is one of the most commonly charged criminal offences. Whether the allegation involves shoplifting or a complex scheme worth thousands of pounds, a conviction carries a criminal record and can result in imprisonment.
About Theft
Theft is defined by Section 1 of the Theft Act 1968: a person is guilty of theft if they dishonestly appropriate property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it. Every element of this definition must be proved by the prosecution. The property must belong to someone else, the defendant must have appropriated it (taken it, kept it, or dealt with it as their own), they must have been dishonest, and they must have intended that the owner would never get it back.
Theft is an either-way offence carrying a maximum sentence of seven years' imprisonment on indictment. However, low-value shoplifting — where the goods are worth less than two hundred pounds — can be tried summarily as if it were a summary offence, with a maximum sentence of six months. The sentencing guidelines distinguish between cases based on the value of the goods stolen, the degree of planning involved, the vulnerability of the victim, and whether the offending was part of a pattern or a one-off incident.
The range of conduct covered by theft is vast. Shoplifting, employee theft, theft from vehicles, theft of bicycles, pickpocketing, and taking property from an employer all fall within the same offence. The context matters enormously for sentencing: a professional employee who systematically steals from their employer over months will be treated very differently from someone who impulsively takes an item from a shop.
Defences to theft centre on the elements the prosecution must prove. If you genuinely believed you had a legal right to the property, you were not dishonest. If you intended to return the property, you did not intend to permanently deprive the owner of it. If you did not realise the property belonged to someone else, you lacked the necessary knowledge. Each of these defences depends on the specific facts and must be supported by evidence, but they can be highly effective when properly presented.
Key Points
- Defined by Section 1 of the Theft Act 1968
- Either-way offence with a maximum of seven years' imprisonment
- Low-value shoplifting under two hundred pounds can be dealt with summarily
- The prosecution must prove dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive
- A genuine belief in legal right to the property is a complete defence
- Sentencing depends heavily on value, planning, breach of trust, and previous convictions
Why Early Representation Matters
We examine the prosecution evidence to identify whether each element of the offence is actually made out. In many theft cases, the real issue is not whether property was taken, but whether the defendant was dishonest and whether they intended to permanently deprive the owner. Challenging these elements — with evidence of a genuine belief in entitlement, a misunderstanding, or an intention to return the property — can lead to acquittal or the acceptance of a lesser charge.
For shoplifting cases, we focus on the practical impact of a conviction and work to achieve the best possible outcome — whether that is a caution, a conditional discharge, or a community order that avoids the worst consequences for your employment and reputation. For more serious theft allegations involving breach of trust or high values, we build a thorough defence that examines the evidence in detail and challenges the prosecution case at trial where appropriate.
Frequently Asked Questions
For a first offence of low-value shoplifting, prison is very unlikely. A fine, conditional discharge, or community order is the usual outcome. However, repeat offending, theft of high-value goods, or theft as part of an organised operation significantly increase the risk of custody. The court also considers whether the offending was planned, whether any force or threats were used, and whether vulnerable victims were targeted.
Yes. Any conviction for theft, including shoplifting, results in a criminal record. Even a caution for theft is recorded and will appear on enhanced DBS checks. A criminal record for dishonesty is particularly damaging because it affects employment in any role involving trust, financial responsibility, or access to vulnerable people.
If you genuinely did not know you had the property — for example, a child placed an item in your bag without your knowledge, or you forgot about an item at the bottom of a trolley — you were not dishonest and did not have the intention required for theft. This can be a genuine defence, but it must be credible and supported by the circumstances.
Yes. Theft by an employee is treated as a breach of trust, which is an aggravating factor in sentencing. The court takes a more serious view because the employer placed trust in the employee, and that trust was abused. Even relatively small amounts stolen by employees can result in custodial sentences, particularly where the theft was systematic or took place over a period of time.
Get an Expert Defence
Complete the form below and a member of our criminal law team will be in touch to discuss your matter in confidence.
Prefer to Call?
Opening Hours
Monday – Friday: 9:00am – 5:30pm
Your Details
Ready to Get Started?
Contact our criminal law team for specialist advice on your theft matter.